INSIDE THE CLASSROOM

                       INSIDE THE CLASSROOM

                      A BEHAVIORAL PERPLEXITY 

 

              AN EXPLANATION BY  KALYAN KUMAR MAHATA

 

HERE IS AN INCIDENT OF DUEL BETWEEN THE APPLIED REASONING AND THE PRACTICAL VISION INSTANTLY EXPERIENCED IN THE CLASSROOM. 

 

 THE INCIDENT :

TWO GIRL STUDENTS WENT OUT THE CLASSROOM. ONE OF THEM ASKED PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE HALL TO CLASS MONITOR ANOTHER DID NOT OBEY THE IMPOSED CLASS RULE. THE TWO ENTERED INTO THE CLASSROOM NOT ASKING TO THE TEACHER TEACHING IN THE CLASS. THE CLASS MONITOR TOLD THE TEACHER THAT THE FIRST ONE WENT OUT THE CLASS , THE SECOND ONE DID NOT. THE ANSWER SURPRISED THE TEACHER. THE MONITOR COPED UP THE SITUATION TELLING THE MISMATCHED WORDS FOR AN UNKNOWN CAUSE, SHE  COVERED UP. 

 THE PLACE :

THE ABOVE INSTANCE TOOK PLACE IN A REMOTE VILLAGE, KULBANI IN WEST  MIDNAPORE DISTRICT IN  INDIA. THE STUDENTS WERE IN STANDARD NINE AT KULBANI HIGH SCHOOL , A WEST BENGAL GOVERNMENT SPONSORED CO-EDUCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL . 

 PUZZLE :

A COMMON QUESTION REFLECTED IN MY MIND THAT WAS THERE ANY SOCIAL CONJURE OR REGIONAL ECO-POLITICAL  (ECONOMIC - POLITICAL) CULTURE DIVERSIFIED THE HEAD GIRL OF THAT CLASS TO CONCEAL THE REALITY BEFORE THE THEN PRESENT EDUCATOR  IN THE CLASSROOM ? THE BIAS AGAINST THE TEACHER IN THE INSTANCE OF PAYING RESPECT, THE STUDENTS ARE FORWARDING IN SELF-ORIENTED NECESSITARIANISM . WHY DID THE HEAD GIRL IN THE CLASS HIDE THE ATTITUDE OF THE SECOND GIRL ? DID SHE MAKE A PROTEST AGAINST THE PRESENT SOCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR JUST LIKE IN A FRIENDLY WIN-WIN SITUATION THE HEAD GIRL AND THE CONCERNED WANTED TO FRAME A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TEACHER AND THE STUDENT PROVED OTHER STUDENTS WRONG IN THE CLASSROOM ? THE QUESTION IS VERY SIMPLE, THOUGH THERE ARE MANY HURDLES AND BARRIERS TO PROVE BEFORE THE FUNDAMENTALISTS. WHILE THE REST OF THE STUDENTS DO NOT SUPPORT THE TEACHER OR STAND FOR THE HEAD GIRL OR REMAIN STOPPED THE MOUTH ; WHAT WILL BE THE ENVIRONMENT OF THAT CLASSROOM ?

 A THOUGHT :

THE MORALITY AND VALUE OF SELF-CONSCIENCE RELATING TO THIS MERE NEGLIGIBLE HAPPENING IS NOT SO IMPORTANT TO THE SOCIAL REFORMER AND EDUCATIONIST IN GENERALLY. THE COMMON SENSE OF ANY LEARNER OR A LECTURER ALSO DOES NOT GET HURT FROM THIS . THIS KIND OF DISRESPECT AND REFUTE THOUGH DO NOT HAMPER THE INSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION . THE PRINCIPAL AIM AND ATTAINMENT IN THE LEARNING SPHERE , DO MATTER ONLY TO THOSE WHO HAVE GONE THROUGH HARASSMENT OR PAID SOMETHING FOR OVERCOMING THE SITUATIONS SACRIFICING OWN SELF GATHERING TORMENTS AND CONDEMNATION . BECAUSE THE TOLERANCE POWER OF THIS TRIFLING PRACTICAL  FALSEHOOD CAN CREATE A PERMANENT SCAR IN THE MIND FOR AN EXAMPLE OF FALSIFICATION , TO THE MANY LEARNERS WHO CAN NOT SUPPORT HEARTILY AND THOSE WHO MIND IT SINCERELY . 

 MEASURES :

THE REPETITION OF INCIDENTS MUST BE ZEROED DOWN , BY INCREASING  THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORITATIVE CIRCULARS ; THE RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD MEMBERS WILL CERTAINLY EMPOWER THE RESPONSIBLE STUDENTS TO ERADICATE THE FOULS IN THE CLASSROOM TO STOP THE FORCEFUL PRE- PLANNED HULLABALOO . 

WHAT NEXT ?

THE IMPACT OF THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT TO THE GREATER SECTION OF THE LEARNER IN THE WORLD IS SOLEMNLY UNVEIL THE TRUTH WHICH COST TO A HEAVY PARTIALITY AMONG THE PUPILS IN THE JUDGEMENT OF THE MERITS. THIS SEEMS BASELESS TO MANY WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN INNER -SELF OR CONSCIENTIOUS RATHER CONSPECUOUSLY DEVELOP THE MANIPULATION . NOW IT IS TIME TO OBSERVE WHAT CHANGES ARE COMING UP NEXT FOR CONFRONTATION ?